Run your scanner for
Recurring hygiene on your own schedule, asset inventory, and external ASV scans where PCI DSS requires them.
ShieldProbe Assess vs vulnerability scanning
Keep your scanner for inventory and recurring checks. ShieldProbe Assess is a penetration test of agreed web apps, APIs, networks and servers. AI runs the testing, and a named consultant approves each finding before you see it.
GET /api/orders/:idAn endpoint exists.
A response was received.
Whose order
is returned?
GET /api/orders/order-b07
Session: customer-a
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{ "ownerId": "customer-b" }Impact: Customer A's session returns Customer B's order.
Reviewed and approved by a named consultant
See this finding in the sample reportScanners vary, and some confirm exploitation for specific checks. A pentest goes further: it follows attack paths and tests how your application behaves for the roles you agree.
Scroll the table sideways to compare both options. You can also focus it and use the arrow keys.
| Compared on | Vulnerability scanning | Penetration test (ShieldProbe Assess) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use | Find assets, misconfigurations and potential vulnerabilities using configured checks. | Follow attack paths and prove impact within an authorized scope. |
| Authentication | Credentialed scans look deeper than unauthenticated ones. | Uses the application roles and test accounts you agree to test logged-in workflows. |
| Business logic | Depends on the checks configured. Application-specific rules usually need manual investigation. | Tests authorization and business workflows against their intended rules, with evidence of what actually happened. |
| Result quality | Potential issues, some of them false positives, that need triage. | Exploit evidence your team can reproduce, with limitations stated. |
| Who reviews the result | Your team or your scanning provider triages the results. | A named consultant reviews and approves each finding before you see it. |
| Deliverable and retest | Scan reports and trend data, depending on the product. | A report with scope, limitations, reproducible request and response, impact and remediation, plus retests of confirmed findings under your engagement terms. |
| Ongoing use | Recurring exposure monitoring and tracking of known issues. | Retests of confirmed findings, and Continuous (developer preview) tests on the repository events you enable. |
| Compliance | Some requirements call for scans specifically, such as PCI DSS external ASV scans. | Pentest evidence where a requirement calls for a penetration test. It does not replace required scans. |
Recurring hygiene on your own schedule, asset inventory, and external ASV scans where PCI DSS requires them.
Before a release that changes authentication or roles, for multi-tenant APIs, when an assessor or customer asks for pentest evidence, and after major change.
For supported application findings, Defend and Fix can follow.
No. Keep it for inventory, patching and required scans. Add a pentest where you need proof of what an attacker can actually do.
Black-box testing works for every target type. Grey-box testing, with agreed roles and test accounts, is for web apps and APIs.
48 hours for an agreed scope, counted from when scope, authorization and access are ready. Added scope is agreed separately.
Both. AI runs the testing, and a named consultant reviews and approves each finding before you see it.
No test can prove that. A clean result means nothing exploitable was found within the agreed scope, access and time window. Test again after significant changes.
Details about other products and standards come from the public sources below, reviewed on 20 October 2026 unless dated. If anything has changed, tell us and we will correct it.