Comparisons
Compare ShieldProbe with the alternatives you are evaluating.
Each comparison answers the same questions: what is tested, who approves a finding, how it gets fixed and how the fix is checked.
ShieldProbe and Pentera
Pentera validates exposure across your estate. ShieldProbe delivers consultant-approved pentests. Compare scope, finding review, retests and fixes.
ShieldProbe and XBOW
Both test web apps and APIs. Compare coverage beyond the internet-facing app, who reviews findings, how fixes are retested, and in-app protection.
ShieldProbe and Horizon3.ai
NodeZero runs autonomous pentests you operate. ShieldProbe Assess is a pentest delivered for you. Compare scope, review, fix verification and protection.
ShieldProbe and Aikido Security
Aikido is a developer security platform with an AI pentest. Compare pentest scope, who reviews findings, in-app protection and code fixes.
ShieldProbe and Terra Security
Both pair AI testing with human review. Compare how each protects a proven exploit while it is being fixed, and how the fix is retested.
ShieldProbe and a pentest consultancy
How a ShieldProbe pentest compares with a consultancy engagement on scope, finding review, delivery time, retests and remediation.
ShieldProbe Assess vs vulnerability scanning
Already run a vulnerability scanner? See what a pentest adds: exploit evidence your team can reproduce, findings approved by a named consultant, and retests.
ShieldProbe and static analysis
SAST reads your code. ShieldProbe pentests the running app and API. See what each method proves, when to use both, and what the evidence looks like.
Details about other products come from their own public pages. If anything is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.